Navigation
Links
Page Summary
multiplexer.livejournal.com - (no subject)
grey-lady.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ross-teneyck.livejournal.com - (no subject)
akuni.livejournal.com - (no subject)
agrimony.livejournal.com - (no subject)
xshelaghx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
randwolf.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gregbo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cmc42.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Heads Up by
- Theme: A Brighter View by and
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:11 pm (UTC)In our culture, we have the perception that women go and get the stable, earner, family-caring jobs (if women work at all after children) and men go off and get the daring, exiting, dream fulfilling jobs that do "cool things."
For a long time, women did not want to go into computer science/engineering because of the nerd club dormitory D&D playing atmosphere, regardless if that was a real perception or not. I knew plenty of women in ENGINEERING, and have always known plenty of women in ENGINEERING, but they have always gone right to Civil or Mechanical and stayed the hell away from computers, so it's clearly not the math and physics. It's the belief that they would have to go pack off to Silicon Valley to live in some apartment with 5 strangers while continuing a distinctly college lifestyle to do computer science and engineering. And you know what? They're not wrong.
The other part is looking at CS/CompEng, going "gee, if I spend 6 years in school my job is just going to get SHIPPED TO INDIA why should I bother?" and go right to something that cannot be outsourced, like nursing. Nursing pays exceptionally well right now, it can't go away, and one can have a family and be an RN. Or a doctor. Or a lawyer. Or even a different kind of engineer. Anything other than the perceived near-guarantee of being tossed out on the street for being too expensive at random.
#1, the geek house, isn't wrong. #2 is. But #2 is a real kicker, and it's a problem we created here all by ourselves. It's the law of unintended consequences -- business built up this perception that they neither wanted nor needed computer scientists in the US so ta-da! No computer scientists in the US!
#1 would totally keep me out of computer engineering but it's been way too late for many years. Sad.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:15 pm (UTC)They mentioned the geek/nerd thing in the article, and yeah...
*sighs sadly* Ah well. Outsourcing does seem to be a big kicker now, and, definitely nursing can't be outsourced.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:22 pm (UTC)If the perception is that computer science is a worthless degree that just gets outsourced and is a total waste of money, then women will go to other degree programs. It's that simple. Hell, if I was entering school today I would not have gone into engineering at all. I went engineering /because/ it had good job prospects. Once that is gone, there's no point and secondary considerations (for me probably applied mathematics at the time) become much more attractive.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:23 pm (UTC)Or on the architecture side. Or on the security side.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 10:13 pm (UTC)He was, however, amused at the behaviour change when there'd be a woman on the course. In classes about web filtering he'd ask people for URLs of X-rated sites - and the male-only classes could contribute lots, whereas a single woman in the classroom meant suddenly the men in the course seemed utterly at a loss to name a single site. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 10:26 pm (UTC)Wow. Yeah... social dynamics...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:25 pm (UTC)I thought I found more women on the sw side, too. *laughs*
So, yeah, it's something of an adjustment for me.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:29 pm (UTC)Also, I'm not convinced that "all the games are for boys" is necessarily the root cause. For one thing, it isn't true; although admittedly the games that girls might tend to favor are not as high-profile so you kind of have to be a gamer to know about them. But I think, for instance, a lot of JRPGs have fairly broad cross-gender appeal.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:52 pm (UTC)Yeah... I think in Japan it's different than here, too.
Okami players seem to mostly be girls... hm. But I can see how the overall US impression might be that way. And I know a lot more female WoW players than male.
It's just... interesting.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:32 pm (UTC)I did a year and a half of Computer Science after I finished my BA before I burnt out on school and needed to not be a student anymore. This was more than ten years ago, and there were loads of female students - but no, not as many as male students. As you watched the classes advance, each higher year held fewer students overall, and what's more the proportion of female students dropped as well. At the graduate level, there were three female grad students when my husband was taking his course, compared to two or sometimes three times that many male students (it changed as people came and left in the program, but you get the gist).
I think it's important to have diversity in the workforce for many reasons, not the least of which is because variety of perspectives is extremely valuable. The opportunities are there today, now we just need to encourage the interest - that's one way in which equality hasn't quite caught up. Sure, being a woman won't hinder me from doing many things these days, but without something to motivate my interest, I'll probably never bother taking advantage of those opportunities.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 10:28 pm (UTC)It just seems the reality keeps getting further and further away... interesting...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 12:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 01:10 am (UTC)The industry may well not reflect the educational statistics.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 03:06 am (UTC)But I digress. XD I would not recommend CS to anyone now. The working conditions suck big time.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 03:49 am (UTC)I have to agree with the last. The time has passed...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 06:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 07:17 pm (UTC)Yeah... satisfaction is important when one might be giving up time with family and loved ones and stuff to do it... it's an interesting mix.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 07:21 am (UTC)As far as (computing) gaming is concerned, I don't know that much about it, but I'd be surprised that the lack of games oriented towards women is more of a disincentive than other things like women being discouraged from pursuing science and engineering careers, or the volatility of the computer job market.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 07:21 pm (UTC)I have to agree with your latter thoughts as well... the game part seems to... trivialize things a bit.
Anyway, thank you for the thoughtful comment!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-21 08:12 pm (UTC)Edit: As much as 20% for straight computer science? Ours is just over 12% maximum (and I bet a few of those 12 people are doing Business Computing or Web Computing). (As you may have guessed from that there's only 98 people in total at my Uni in the second year Computer Science course)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-21 10:20 pm (UTC)YAY that you're studying computer science!!
Hee. I love your icon for this comment. *grins*