The Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming
Yes. I think about a third of my flist is going to die laughing, and the other two-thirds will be what is she on?
Yes. I think about a third of my flist is going to die laughing, and the other two-thirds will be what is she on?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 10:19 pm (UTC)*Stops reading*
Not a good idea in the middle of my Computer Science degree exams lol. I'll read the rest of them after the 24th May.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 01:15 am (UTC)It would be terrible to mix this with reality. Explosive even.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 10:32 pm (UTC)Have fun storming the processor.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 01:17 am (UTC)I shall do my best!!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 11:00 pm (UTC)Of course, mention not FORTH pop!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 01:17 am (UTC)Yes!!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 12:51 am (UTC)1972 - Alain Colmerauer designs the logic language Prolog. His goal is to create a language with the intelligence of a two year old. He proves he has reached his goal by showing a Prolog session that says "No." to every query.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 01:19 am (UTC)Oh, lord.
Yes. I NEED to have a world where magic works in programing language... or maybe a magician that uses that instead of the gobbilty gook of other mere mortals.
One thing about the Dresden world, everyone uses their own word and gesture set, whatever invokes their power... so it would fit in there quite bemusingly well.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 01:31 am (UTC)I was taking Prolog, as you can guess, and was...... not impressed. So. Not. Impressed. Thus, the doodle.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 03:03 am (UTC)Great doodle!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 02:33 pm (UTC)1965 - Kemeny and Kurtz go to 1964.
This shouldn't make me laugh anywhere near as much as it does, but it gets me every time.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 05:05 pm (UTC)*falls over giggling*
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 04:52 pm (UTC)When I was in college I worked in the engineering computer labs, assisting students. I was required to know FORTRAN for the job (and, in fact, kicked butt at it), because all engineering students had to take it, but only the CS majors had to take Pascal and I didn't know it. Nonetheless, I would often give in to the desperate pleas of CS students to just come look at it anyway even though I told them I didn't know the language. "I think you're missing a semicolon," was the one single piece of advice I could possibly give.
The success rate of that was amazing -- I bet it was upwards of 75%.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 05:21 pm (UTC)I loved FORTRAN, it worked the way I thought it should. Pascal... *shakes head*
*laughs* I love your solution...
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-12 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 06:14 pm (UTC)Would you believe they were still requiring CS students to take COBOL in the late 90s? *beats head on desk* On the up side, the year I joined the program was the year they finally switched the first year teaching language to Java... from Fortran. ;) I get that students have to be able to work on legacy systems when they go out into the workforce, but wow.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 06:46 pm (UTC)My MOM knows COBOL and that's... frightening.
hee. Go you with Q-bert!!
Given that, now, any language they learn in school will be obsolete by the time they get out, it's... kind of intriguing to think about how to teach programming that isn't dependent on the language itself.
I mean... English restricts how we think, if one really thinks about it; but it's SO much more evident that a programming language either gets in the way of or facilities how one thinks about a problem. So it's so much more desirable to have a language one can think easily in. I know a lot of admins who *think* in perl, and when I was still programming I used to dream in C++. *laughs*
Odd how the human mind can work...