(no subject)
May. 28th, 2002 11:20 amThis seemed a mildly intriguing take on the old quizzes. It's not *that* thorough, but it's interesting. Thanks,
sbisson! You don't have to fill in the name and email address if you don't want other people to compare to you.
How compatible are you with me?
Of course I'm not entirely sold on the idea that *similarity* leads to compatibility, but it's still interesting.
How compatible are you with me?
Of course I'm not entirely sold on the idea that *similarity* leads to compatibility, but it's still interesting.
Wow.
Date: 2002-05-28 10:45 am (UTC)92% relationship compatibility
that's pretty compatible.
Re: Wow.
Date: 2002-05-28 10:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-28 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-28 03:12 pm (UTC)94% friendship, 96% relationship compatibility. Hee.
no subject
Date: 2002-05-28 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-28 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-29 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-28 03:29 pm (UTC)89% friendship compatibility
92% relationship compatibility
I don't think I picked many extremes, though. Hm. When I went through and reversed my answers (0 <-> 5, 1 <-> 4, 2 <-> 3) I got a mere 66%/63%. Inneresting.
Now available: my test entry.
no subject
Date: 2002-05-28 04:16 pm (UTC)I think I'm now deeply concerned.
no subject
Date: 2002-05-30 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-28 07:43 pm (UTC)I'll have to agree with you on being dubious that similarity -> compatibility. Of those people I've met who seem similar to me, especially males, it's usually been gritted-teeth at first sight. Complimentary, not unlike selecting good contrasting colors, seems a more likely model...
no subject
Date: 2002-05-29 08:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-29 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-29 08:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-05-29 08:26 am (UTC)you are 93% complimentary
Looks like you're a generally compatible person =)
no subject
Date: 2002-05-29 08:47 am (UTC)